coppervale links to a Sesame Street video that is a nice snapshot of the writing process. Meanwhile, this post of his just gave me shivers. A new cover for Justine Labalestier’s Liar, yay! Using Twilight to market Wuthering Heights. I actually enjoyed Wuthering Heights back in college, but even so, since I always assumed that, you know, we weren’t supposed to take its relationships as functional … so knowing Edward and Bella liked it too explains So Much. (I assume this comes up in book 3? Or did I forget it in the haze of Bella taking Romeo and Juliet as a good model for life decisions, too?) Choose your own apocalypse. (Via the Powells twitter feed.) Also, the creators have designed a sort of apocalyptic social network which shows which apocalypses are linked to which other apocalypses, social-network style. You aren’t the book I married anymore. (Via Colleen Lindsay’s twitter feed.) Funny how, in arguing for why feminism is unnecessary and even evil, the author of this article unwittingly explains why feminism is still very, very necessary indeed. Don’t click unless you want to get very, very angry. But if you do click, but sure to click on this response as well. (Via jonquil.)I’ve discussed the health care/health insurance issue with my colleagues. The question they (along with the rest of the world) are asking is not “how can America afford to provide basic health care for its population?” It’s “How does America manage to pay so much for what it’s getting?” The amount of money that passes through the medical system in the US is not ordinary, not inevitable, and not necessary.
This most excellent post by YA writer Neesha Meminger on why the issues involved when whites write people of color are different from the issues involved when people of color write white characters–and the roles we all have to play in addressing power imbalances of all sorts gave me some good things to think about:
White folks, in general, need to turn *outward* and really see what’s outside of themselves and their immediate circles. And people of color must turn *inward*, to discover the true value within, then paint the world with it … the “reverse” discrimination argument … doesn’t take into consideration the fact that oppression is about power imbalance—not just name-calling and hurt feelings. In the case of a parent-child relationship, when a parent smacks a child with all his might, the effect is far different than when a child smacks a parent with all her might. The latter is not “reverse” abuse. The former results in lasting physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual scarring while the second leaves hardly an imprint. Why? Because there is a massive power imbalance on every level. The child is completely dependent on the parent for her very survival. And the parent is far stronger and bigger than she is.